Static and dynamic guided bone regeneration using a shape-memory polyethylene terephthalate membrane: An experimental study in rabbit mandible.

BACKGROUND: Periosteal expansion (PEO) results in the formation of new bone in the space created between existing bone by expanding the periosteum. PEO has already been performed on rabbit parietal bone and effective new bone formation has been demonstrated. In this study, the utility of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane as an activator was evaluated in the more complex morphology of the mandible. METHODS: A PET membrane coated with hydroxyapatite (HA)/gelatine was placed in the rabbit mandibular bone at lower margin of mandibular molar region underneath periosteum, and screw-fixed. In the experimental group, the membrane was bent and screw-fixed along the lateral surface of the bone, with removal of the outer screw after 7 days followed by activation of the membrane. The experimental group was divided into two subgroups: with and without a waiting period for activation. Three animals were euthanized at 3 weeks and another three at 5 weeks postoperatively. Bone formation was assessed using micro-CT as well as histomorphometric and histological methods. RESULTS: No PET membrane-related complications were observed. The area of newly formed bone and the percentage of new bone in the space created by the stretched periosteum did not significantly differ between the control and experimental groups. However, in the experimental group a greater volume was present after 5 weeks than after 3 weeks. Histologically, bone formation occurred close to the site of cortical bone perforation, with many sinusoidal vessels extending through the perforations in the new bone into the overlying fibrous tissue. Inflammatory cells were not seen in the bone.

Condylar Resorption Following Compressive Mechanical Stress in Rabbit Model - Association of Matrix Metalloproteinases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is a morphological change of the condylar head that occurs following orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery. This complication is serious, as it can cause relapse after mandible treatment. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the mechanism of influence of condylar resorption on compressive mechanical stress in temporomandibular joint following a change in occlusal position by mandible advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An osteotomy procedure at the midline of mandible was performed in 15 rabbits, with the left side moved forward by 3.5 mm. Advancement of the left side of the mandible resulted in compressive mechanical stress on condylar head on the left side. Samples were subjected to micro-computed tomography, histological staining and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The area and depth of anterior condylar resorption at two weeks were significantly different as compared to those at one week (p<0.05). TRAP staining confirmed the significantly largest number of TRAP-positive cells after two weeks (p=0.02), compared to one week. MMP-3 and MMP-13 immunostaining of the anterior condylar head at two weeks revealed high levels of both proteins from the surface to the deep layer of cartilage. CONCLUSION: Compressive mechanical stress following mandible advancement results in load on the anterior surface of the condylar head, which leads to bone resorption there, and induces MMP-3 and MMP-13 related to degradation of condylar head cartilage.

A collagen membrane for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using a timed-release system in rabbit calvaria.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of resorbable membranes, combined with a shape memory alloy (SMA) mesh device, on bone formation using a timed-release system for periosteal expansion osteogenesis (TIME-PEO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve Japanese white rabbits were used in this study. An SMA device was inserted under the forehead periosteum, pushed and bent for attachment to the bone surface, and then fixed using resorbable thread. The rabbits were divided into four groups: C1 (5 weeks postoperatively without membrane), C2 (8 weeks postoperatively without membrane), E1 (5 weeks postoperatively with membrane), and E2 (8 weeks postoperatively with membrane). The rabbits were killed 5 or 8 weeks after the operation and the newly formed bone was assessed histologically and radiographically. RESULTS: SMA devices, concealed under soft tissue until the time of euthanasia, did not cause active inflammation. The mean activation height, from the original bone surface to the midpoint of the mesh, was 3.1 ± 0.6 mm. Newly formed bone was observed, and most of the subperiosteal space underneath the device was occupied by fibrous tissue. Immature bone was present at the outer surface of the original skull bone in all groups. On histomorphometric analysis, there was no significant difference in the volume of the new bone between C1 and E1 (p = 0.885), and C2 and E2 (p = 0.545). CONCLUSIONS: PEO using an SMA mesh device, which is based on guided bone regeneration (in atrophic alveolar bone), shows promise as an alternative for bone augmentation, irrespective of whether a resorbable membrane is used.

Periosteal expansion osteogenesis using an innovative, shape-memory polyethylene terephthalate membrane: An experimental study in rabbits.

Periosteal expansion osteogenesis (PEO) results in the formation of new bone in the gap between periosteum and original bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane as an activation device. A dome-shaped PET membrane coated with hydroxyapatite/gelatin on the inner side was inserted between the elevated periosteum and bone at the rabbit calvaria. In the experimental group, the membrane was pushed, bent, and attached to the bone surface and fixed with a titanium screw. In control group, the membrane was only inserted and fixed with titanium screw at original shape under the periosteum. After 7 days, the screw was removed and the mesh was activated in the experimental group. Three animals per group with or without setting a latency period for activation were sacrificed at 3 and 5 weeks after surgery. Bone formation was evaluated via micro-computed tomography and determined by histomorphometric methods and histological evaluation. No PET membrane-associated complications were observed during this study. The quantitative data by the area and the occupation of newly formed bone indicated that the experimental group had a higher volume of new bone than the control group at 3 weeks after surgery. Histologically, bone formation progressed to areas adjacent to the cortical perforations; many sinusoidal vessels ran from the perforations to overlying fibrous tissue via the new bone. No bone or obvious inflammatory cells were observed over the membrane. The PET membrane has biocompatible device for PEO that induces a natural osteogenic response at the gap between the original bone and periosteum.